It is important for all cities and towns to have large outdoor public spaces, such as parks or squares. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

As people are living in the world of cut-throat competition, it is inevitable to sharpen the axe to survive and exist on the planet earth. So having some places to relax and get energised in those places where individuals are tightly scheduled can be the best option. I completely agree with the notion as it is the best way to fine-tune one's skills and talents although it can be used for some other purposes which may multiply the revenue of a country.

On the one hand, one of the prime benefits of having some recreational facilities in the urban centres is that it contributes to the healthy lifestyle of its inhabitants and other professionals. To put it another way, nowadays as people need more income to meet their needs and bring reputation in the society they are compelled to work more which may lead to complex life situations. Here the role of parks, squares and other places of enjoyment come as a saviour to let them get rid of tensions and be kicking and alive. In India, like many other developed nations, for example, almost all the metropolitan cities got these basic amenities which boost one's working capacity and readiness to proceed with the profession. So having some places of enjoyment in town centres is the need of this hour.

On the other hand, although maintaining parks and gardens in the town centres brings many advantages to the individuals, it's a great loss for the country from a financial perspective. In other words, if the land, which is proposed for recreational centres, is used for the construction of industries or business centres it would multiply the overall income of a nation which would contribute to the development of a nation. Moreover, these parks and squares do not have a considerable role to bring stability and boost the economy as less income can be generated from the visitors.

To conclude, although reserving some land in the urban centres makes a financial loss to the nation, by considering individual well-being and economic stability, in the long run, it can be counted as the urgent need me the working generation.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tion as it is the best way to fine-tune ones skills and talents although it can be u...
^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life situations. Here the role of parks, squares and other places of enjoyment co...
^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...nd be kicking and alive. In India, like many other developed nations, for example, almost...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndia, like many other developed nations, for example, almost all the metropolitan...
^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ngs many advantages to the individuals, its a great loss for the country from a fin...
^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es makes a financial loss to the nation, by considering individual well-being and...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78947720218 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515406162465 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6754857664 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116743951119 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462876351054 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042121751416 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647689972433 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411462654873 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.