It is argued how morality sould be taught to children at their initial stage of development. There are some who believe that punishment is required to improve children's behavior, and make them understand the right. This essay will discuss the reasons why I disagree with the later statement, and the appropriate alternative methods that could be used by parents and teachers.
First and foremost, even if disciplinary actions were used since ages to bring children into the right path, I am of the view that in modern times punishments are not such effective measures because they can harm children physically and mentally. Indeed, punishments, especially corporal punishment, aiming to teach children the value of morals and ethics, do not serve this purpose if they include violence, such as spanking. According to a recent study of Harvard Univeristy, corporal punishment damages the relationship between kids and parents leading to harmful effects in children's mindset. This is why I think that there are corrective measures which not only do they play a pivotal role in children's behavior, but also they do not have a negative impact.
Rather that hitting children or correcting children's mistakes, understanding the consequences of your own behavior is a far more effective method to penalize the wrong behavior and make children aware of the right one. More specifically, parents and teachers should use strategies that will help children learn form their mistakes, while also cultivating their decision-making skills and justice instincts. For instance, parents could leave their children wihtout completing their homework, if they do not want to, making them feel embarassed the next day at school. In this way, natural consequences of children's behavior will make them be more disciplined, and understand the difference between the right and the wrong.
In conslusion, although some people opine that punishments are needed for a child to be aware of the right and the wrong, I strongly disagree with this statement, since there are alternative methods available to teachers and parents serving more effectively this purpose.
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The pie chart below shows tge results of a survey of the causes foor poor learning outcomes in schools in a particularly country in 2011 73
- The table below shows the hours of leisure time spent by people in different age groups in Someland Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...they do not have a negative impact. Rather that hitting children or correcting chi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to form'
Suggestion: to form
...trategies that will help children learn form their mistakes, while also cultivating ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38392857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88275812899 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5151291696 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.75 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288983879275 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110617459055 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042423410387 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181511699553 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01856984611 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.