The issue of punishing children is one that needs to be looked at carefully. Over the past few years, there has been a growing body of opinion that it is critical for kids and teenagers to know the difference between right and wrong at an early age and punishment is vital to help them learn this distinction. Many people hold the opinion that parents and teachers should not punish children. However, I completely agree with the opinion that parents and teachers should use proper punishments to help children understand morality and ethics, and in this essay, I will present the reason for my view, which is that society will benefit from those children who learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Besides, appropriate punishments should be applied to teach children good behavior.
On the one hand, the most compelling reason for holding my view is that society will benefit from those children who can distinguish between good and bad behavior. This is due to the fact that if children learn to differentiate right and wrong at an early age, they will understand morality and ethics. A good example of this is that when students learn that taking something that does not belong to them is bad behavior, they will never steal anything in the future. That is why teaching morality would increase the number of well-rounded people and create a greater source of good members for society, which would bring more advantages to the country. In short, it helps to demonstrate that when children learn courses related to morality and ethics in schools, they will become good citizens for society in the future.
On the other hand, people usually think punishments are violence. It is true that some traditional families are still using rods to penalize their children. Nevertheless, I think there are some proper punishments that not only are non-violent but also help children learn their lessons. For example, parents and teachers can use a reward system to guide their children to adopt proper behaviors. This means that when children have not completed their assignments or housework, they are not allowed to play games or hang out with friends. As a result, they will try to complete their tasks to get their rewards. In short, violent punishments are not the correct way to teach children about right and wrong, so parents and teachers should use punishments that help children learn from their mistakes so they can remember the lesson.
By way of conclusion, I believe that teaching children to differentiate between right and wrong at an early age will create a greater source of well-rounded individuals for society in the long run, and parents and teachers should focus on helping children learn lessons from their mistakes instead of punishing them with violent behavior. Therefore, it seems to me that it is crucial for children to understand morality and ethics at a young age, and there are some proper punishments to help them learn this distinction.
- More big shopping malls are being built and they replace small shops. Is this a positive or negative development? 56
- Some people prefer to live in small family units, while others think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both of views and give your opinion. 61
- Sending criminals to prison is not the effective method to deal with them. Education and job training should be used instead. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people believe a high salary is the most important factor when choosing a job. Others believe that a good working environment is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 16
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, i think, in short, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 25.0 7.30460921844 342% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 24.0651302605 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 500.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.986 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60010692088 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414 0.561755894193 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.6916270886 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.210526316 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3157894737 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15789473684 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420339700646 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152854373005 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115577721801 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314020252417 0.151304729494 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128960778993 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, i think, in short, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 25.0 7.30460921844 342% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 24.0651302605 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 500.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.986 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60010692088 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414 0.561755894193 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.6916270886 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.210526316 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3157894737 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15789473684 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420339700646 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152854373005 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115577721801 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314020252417 0.151304729494 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128960778993 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.