It is important for towns to have large public outdoor places like square or parks
Author states that it is important for towns to have large public outdoor places and in my opinion, author's claims holds credence. Generally such outdoor places like squares and parks allow people to take respite from their sedulous work schedule and helps in contributing a bit to environment. Following are the reasons for my accordance towards author's claim.
Firstly, outdoor places like parks and square consumes a space which might be used for other process like for industry, buildings, etc. which might have severe effects on climate. Whereas, parks will contribute towards alleviating negative effects on environment. In my city, We do have parks and people visits parks and other such places to take fresh air.Though there can be private outdoor places but private places hobble people to visit due to charge incurred. Not every person is wealthy enough to afford daily costs.
Secondly, it is pretty obvious that people do need places for their recreational activities and reserving such places would allow people to enjoy their life. parks and such places are occupied with people age group ranging from babies to elders. In an old age, people are more addicted to such places where they can socialize with other people or with their friends. Thus, it is important for a town to have such places. In my childhood, I have spent most of my time in such places. I with my grandparents used to visit such places and play with my friends. Sometimes such places make people learn different values and morals and about how to build connection with different people.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that having large public outdoor is important as it allow large mass to relieve their stress and allow people to spend time with other people.
- Teachers’ salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings. 58
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 83
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h might have severe effects on climate. Whereas, parks will contribute towards alleviat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Though
...and other such places to take fresh air.Though there can be private outdoor places but...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Parks
...would allow people to enjoy their life. parks and such places are occupied with peopl...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
...large public outdoor is important as it allow large mass to relieve their stress and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04109589041 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40709333635 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517123287671 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6692707622 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41104428739 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137979718198 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120874970502 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281289737451 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102038007112 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.