It is impossible to help all people in the world, so government should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Global integration is the major tendency of all countries in the world. Some people suppose that helping all people in need around the world would be an impossible idea for government, instead focusing on those who live in their own countries. I strongly disagree with the above viewpoint. In this essay, I certainly clarify why international mutual help is necessary for each country, especially in this state-of-art society.
Nobody can not deny that compassionate leadership can unify us as human being in times of crisis and social unrest. Help is not necessarily finance or material, it also has a variety of supportive methods in many corners of life, for instance, human resource, health or education. When our planet declines poverty and disease, this would bring the prosperity as well as create a period of peace for our planet. As an evidence, each country is regard as a member of neighborhood. Family, who lives in a residential area with high sense of community certainly feel peaceful and comfortable rather than living in the place with heavy population full of social evils and non-security condition, beyond a nation among nations.
Apparently, each country has its own potentiality ranging from military power, border position to food. Thus, supporting underdeveloped countries is consider as an intelligent indirect investment. What is more, it helps those countries account for the top place of priority investment and mark their names in international forum.
All in all, every country in the world has an implicit connection to develop and bring the well-being to the Earth, whereas all nations have more or less responsibility to support other nations on a certain field, particularly for underdeveloped countries based on friendly and cooperative spirits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | M_TPhan | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
... supporting underdeveloped countries is consider as an intelligent indirect investment. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, more or less, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3109540636 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03768158236 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639575971731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0985189562 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.615384615 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213471741917 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711116994841 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803778993328 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135795466394 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922824870103 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.