It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question whether governments should provide aids internationally or domestically has drawn much attention from the public. Although I understand why helping everyone in the world is unachieveable, I strongly disagree that governmental support should solely be concentrated on satisfying local needs.
On the one hand, I suppose the world’s leaders’ hesitation over the provision of international aids to deprived regions is legitimate. Firstly, it is unfeasible for governments’ support to reach all of the underprivileged as their number is enormous in many separated places around the globe and the type of support they need also varies. For example, developed nations may encounter numerous obtacles in terms of transportation upon sending food and medicines to unwealthy regions scattereing around Africa where people are facing the threat of famine or contagions. Secondly, I believe leaders of a country should prioritize the well-being of their citizens and stablize their economy and politics before carrying out any acts of gobal assistance.
On the other hand, I still believe governments should help as many people as they can regardless of the fragile odds for worldwide comprehensive support for all people. To begin with, in many underdeveloped countries, their leaders are unable to bear the burden of eradicating domestic poverty or crises due to, for example, terrorism, which calls for the involvement from other affluent nations. Also of great significance is that this national act of charity could have a huge impact upon individuals living in prosperous areas. If the government take actions to help people overseas, citizens of that country will idolize the idea of self-devotion toward a better world.
In conclusion, I truly believe the world leaders should lend their neighbors a hand to offer help to people in need on their doorstep.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | kienbanhkem | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-23 | kienbanhkem | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 61 | view |
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Music plays an important role in society others think it is simply a form of entertainment for individuals Discuss both and give your opinion 89
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspaper any more To what extent do you argee or disagree with this viewpoint 78
- Some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "The question"?
Suggestion: Whether
The question whether governments should provide aids interna...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sible for governments’ support to reach all of the underprivileged as their number is enor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nvolvement from other affluent nations. Also of great significance is that this nati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48620689655 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13138574666 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613793103448 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.1749650888 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.636363636 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251679040679 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951667626071 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714961744897 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166429482717 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396694483298 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.