it is more important for children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
many people valued the role of local history over than that of world history. I disagree with this statement as both of them are equally important for young learners.
On the one hand, studying the history of their hometown is for sure an indispensable part of curriculum subjects at school. Students will gain thorough insights into what happened in the past at one’s local, followed by cultivating their patriotism. For example, no sooner are primary and secondary students taught about how their ancestors defended their land against outside intruders and reclaimed sovereignty than they would take pride of their origin and treasure the life they enjoy today. In addition, only by deepening understanding of the meaning and historical values of heritages and events do people feel more confident to introduce the beauty of their own hometown to foreign friends. This is also a beneficial way to promote our national images and attract tourism.
On the other hand, children would benefit the most only when the learning of local history is placed parallel to that of world history. Firstly, children will enhance their cognitive ability. It is true that local and global historical events are inter-related, therefore, in order to understand these events children should put the regional ad even world context in the historical era. Secondly,acquiring knowledge about the world’s past events bring children golden selling point to assimilate into the world culture, which makes them become global citizens.
In conclusion, i would content that the significance of domestic and international history are equal to children. This practice would guarantee children with comprehensive and thorough historical knowlwedge and tighten the bond between global citizens
- some people claim that secondary school should study international news as one of their subjects in secondary school. Others believe that such thing just wastes a lot of time. Discuss 89
- many parents go to work in other countries and take family with them. The advantages and disadvantages 78
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- the line graph shows changes in the consumption of meat from 1955 to 2012. 84
- Topic: some people think that the best way to gather information is through newspapers while others believe in other better ways. Discuss both of views. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
many people valued the role of local history...
^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ooner are primary and secondary students taught about how their ancestors defende...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'interred'.
Suggestion: interred
... local and global historical events are inter related, therefore, in order to underst...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , acquiring
... context in the historical era. Secondly,acquiring knowledge about the world's past e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...come global citizens. In conclusion, i would content that the significance of ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48727272727 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81917870931 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7460608162 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285725406464 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929539204183 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688132557083 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166912278394 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783603744397 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.