Many people have valued the role of domestic history to schoolchildren over that of international history. However, I believe that this notion should be rejected as both of them ought to be given similar attention based on the following arguments.
Having thorough insights into the history of one’s locality is, undeniably, indispensable for students’ early education. Children who understand the history of their country are more likely to appreciate their culture and the contribution of their ancestors. This appreciation will help them to build up patriotism and grow into proud citizens. For example, it is compulsory for primary and high school students in my country to learn about how their ancestors defended their land against outside intruders. Therefore, those children would treasure the liberty and privileges they are enjoying and not take those for granted.
On the other hand, world history is no less important than local one. There is little room for doubt that globalization is one of the most conspicuous trend recently. Consequently, the mere understanding of domestic history and traditions is insufficient for learners’ future career. Better knowledge of international issues is considered key to promoting mutual understanding and cooperation. As a result, those students who accumulate knowledge in this particular field would stand a higher chance of employment as well as promotion, especially if they wish to work for multinational corporations. In addition, the study of local history should not be separated from world history, as the two fields are closely related. What happened in the past in one country might be attributed to other events occurring elsewhere. Therefore, acquiring knowledge about international history equips students with a more well-rounded perspective, aiding them in obtaining the knowledge more thoroughly and comprehensively.
In conclusion, I believe the significance of domestic and international history cannot be brought into comparison because they have distinctively equal meanings to school children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75483870968 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28823463164 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603225806452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0540146273 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228731866699 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708353459801 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636805670456 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111422846774 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702398250458 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.