It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that animal species which are in endangered a situation a natural phenomenon, there is no need for citizens to make an effort as a part of a plan to curb these faunas from degrading. I completely do not coincide with this perspective.
On the on hand, I presume that there are a great deals of reasons which lead to the loss biodiversity of these animal species. Firstly, Because individuals often have a propensity to throw rubbish away indiscriminately and take part in illegal logging. As a result, these activities will take a heavy toll on mother nature and the degradation of environment will be created. Most noticeable things is that animal life depends significantly on the ecosystem, threatened species struggle to find out their food and accommodation therefore the lack of indispensable things will prevent them from existing.
On the other hand, I think it is vital for authority and humans to be responsible for this adverse phenomenon of the fauna. Firstly, Apart from hospital, infrastructure and school, state officials should invest more in environment as a way to environmental conservation which will assist fauna overcome the loss of biodiversity. A typical example of this is that the governments should enact environmental legislation and impose heavy taxes on enterprises which do not build waste disposal treatment system. Secondly, it is crucial for states to punish harshly on lawbreakers dumping waste without thinking about its downside. Many evidences suggest that animals can hardly maintain their life unless the governments attend to the needs of them.
In conclusion, animal species which are in endangered the situation is not a natural phenomenon, by taking action which is related to protect extinct species, the authorities should put more resources into combating the loss biodiversity of animal
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-22 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | tienallen' | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | tienallen' | 67 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment Do the drawbacks of living in a house outweigh the benefits
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment Do the drawbacks of living in a house outweigh the benefits 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Walking is known to be beneficial to health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days What are the reasons for this What can be done to tackle this problem 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28813559322 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11742054112 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.593128892 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20622561823 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698021217785 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442246628881 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132396831564 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360517954701 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.