Walking has long been acknowledged as a healthy activity but people are increasingly unwilling to walk in the contemporary age. Reasons for this trend vary, but workable solutions are available to encourage individuals to have a walk regularly.
To begin with, the decreased popularity of walking can be ascribed to two main factors. One significant reason is the appearance of convenient modes of transport. As options such as the car and bus can allow commuters to travel quickly and conveniently, people are likely to prefer them to walking even though the distance is relatively short. By contrast, it would take walkers more time to reach their destinations and sometimes, unfavorable weather conditions may make walking a less attractive choice. Moreover, in most high-rise buildings, lifts and escalators have been installed. These modern machines are able to save people’s moving time, so gradually those who live or work in multi-story buildings would lose their interest in using the stairs.
However, to rekindle people’s interest in walking, the following methods should be implemented simultaneously. First, the health benefits of walking should be promoted on the mass media. Because many people are still ignorant of the advantages of this activity, proper education through local, regional and national television as well as radio broadcasts might solve the problem. If the importance of walking is realized, people would proactively sacrifice few minutes to have a walk either in a building or on the street. Second, walking experiences should be made more enjoyable. For instance, 3D paintings should be added to the walls along the stairs or more trees and plants need to be put in the corridors. These
added features would excite people and they would be more likely to use the stairs.
In conclusion, walking is less preferred due to the advent of modern means of transport and technological equipment in buildings. Nevertheless, promotional campaigns and decorations along the stairs can help address the given problem.
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find the way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment Do the drawbacks of living in a house outweigh the benefits 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Walking is known to be beneficial to health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days What are the reasons for this What can be done to tackle this problem 89
- Some people say the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38819875776 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97960772401 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611801242236 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.789824942 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.058823529 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306508043385 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938314116866 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500712564531 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155304760851 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752980932008 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38819875776 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97960772401 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611801242236 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.789824942 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.058823529 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306508043385 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938314116866 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500712564531 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155304760851 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752980932008 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.