Walking is known to be beneficial to health and yet, fewer and fewer people are
walking these days.
What are the reasons for this? What can be done to tackle this problem?
Physical exercises, such as walking, have an important role to play in keeping fit and living a healthy life, but an increasing number of people are giving up on this activity these days. This emerging trend is ascribed to many factors and there are some workable solutions that should be adopted to deal with this.
There are many compelling reasons why fewer and fewer people are willing to walk on a regular basis in recent years. One of the main causes is that there is an acute shortage of designated places for citizens to have a walk, especially in metropolitan areas. This results from the fact that in modern times, the government and authorities often give priority to construction for residential and business purposes and therefore neglect planning areas for physical activities such as parks, squares, and public gardens. Another plausible explanation is the domination of cutting-edge technology in modern life, which nurtures a sedentary lifestyle. Young adults, for example, tend to use their smartphones excessively for recreational activities like playing games, watching movies, and listening to music rather than going outside to have a walk.
In order to address this problem, a number of effective measures are available. The first viable way is for governmental agencies and authorities to build more parks and playgrounds. This creates favorable spaces for outdoor activities and consequently motivates dwellers to walk more. Secondly, schools, companies and local authorities should make a concerted effort to hold weekly or monthly walking competitions for both children and adults to partake in. These events would not only raise public awareness about the benefits of exercises but also, with prizes, really urge them to practice. Each individual, therefore, would become more health-conscious and gradually corporate this activity into their daily routine.
In conclusion, more and more people avoid walking due to the lack of public places and the proliferation of technology, but this problem can be tackled by building more public places and holding regular walking contests. Implementing these viable measures simultaneously could exert positive impacts on the public's physical and mental health, and hopefully, each person will actively walk more for their own good.
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment Do the drawbacks of living in a house outweigh the benefits 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Walking is known to be beneficial to health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days What are the reasons for this What can be done to tackle this problem 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find the way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at should be adopted to deal with this. There are many compelling reasons why fe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4649859944 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86475341637 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3820903503 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.066666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30205404778 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940784233238 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627595684392 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176895969575 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267344324771 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.