It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
The modern era of urbanization has witnessed severe extinction of animal species as their habitats have become continuously hazardous. It is argued by some that this is a natural process and humans have no responsibility to deter this from happening. Personally, I partly agree with this viewpoint as people also must be accountable for what they have impacted negatively on the wild environment to protect endangered species as well as retain benefits that people can get from animals.
To commence with, to some extent, I concur that it is true that some extinction has occurred due to natural changes and people cannot prevent it. Indeed, certain groups of species, such as dinosaurs or dodos,... have undergone extinction when they cannot adapt to hostile changes in habitats which sometimes stem from nature’s impact on the Earth or even from other planets’ influences. Despite of state- of - the -art science, it is extremely challenging and expensive for people to cope with nature's power while it is more beneficial for humans to invest in their living conditions. Moreover, extinction is also a foundation for another evolution in which new species may appear with stronger survival ability so it is unnecessary to stop it. To illustrate, after the era of dinosaurs ended, life on Earth continued followed by the emergence of other species which are supposed to be descendants of them.
However, I still opine that people have to take responsibility to alleviate extinction and protect wild animals for two primary reasons. First and foremost, it is humans who impact the earth’s habitat, partly causing climate changes that pose a threat to animals’ lives. The more skyscrapers and urban areas emerge along with the increase in industrial waste, the more forests that are home to wild animals are destroyed. Such impacts do not originate from nature and people definitely can pursue sustainable development which not only brings betterment in human life but also maintains a wild environment for animals. In addition, as long as precious animals disappear, it means that people lose some benefits from such animals so protecting wildlife is also for the sake of human life. For instance, some medicines to treat serious diseases, that scientists still cannot explore alternative substances, are extracted from some parts of animals
In conclusion, although people cannot struggle with the natural selection process in which some animals die because of the lack of survival ability, humans still should take the onus to prevent negative artificial impacts on the environment. This not only protects endangered animals but also is beneficial to human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s of species, such as dinosaurs or dodos,... have undergone extinction when they c...
^^
Line 5, column 946, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are extracted from some parts of animals In conclusion, although people cannot st...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29342723005 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81792682141 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514084507042 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6740074585 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.9375 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288499421508 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981510104737 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045370034988 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188155900792 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491975359967 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.