It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the opinion that scientists can go to far-off natural places, like the South Pole. From my perspective, this issue brings more restrictions than benefits.
First of all, despite expanding knowledge about far natural environments, it is undeniable that people can lose their lives through traveling to remote natural environments. In fact, their lifespan can be decreased by the dangers of those places if they are unlikely to prepare full equipment and essential objects because they are unable to face extreme weather and wild animals in this destination without the necessary equipment. For example, according to BBC News, there were fifty-five people who lost their lives and went missing distant natural areas because they were attacked by wild animals in the South Pole in 2010.
Secondly, researchers may waste a lot of money going to the isolated areas, and they can feel exhausted through going on this journey. To be more specific, because they live far from the far-off natural environment, they need to have plenty of money to purchase car tickets, and then they are arrived there by car. Specifically, they can be tired because they have to sit in one seat on public transport when they come to those destinations for a long time. Residents may be exhausted due to working there for a long period. Take my parents as an example, about 5 years ago, they took a trip to South Africa to discover lifestyle and weather conditions which are extremely useful to their reports, but after exploring this place for about 30 minutes, they feel tired due to not preparing fully food and equipment.
To conclude, due to the numerous mentioned reasons, it is my belief that this phenomenon has more disadvantages than advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | maiduc | 89 | view |
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 73
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00996677741 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6930266166 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9215674284 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.090909091 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1399994012 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059632483846 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396080350147 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952876640604 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303764094187 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.