It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives.
How could robots be used in the future?
Will it positive or negative trend?
Utilising robots will effectively paramount for human lives and this what is forecasted. This essay not only discuss the usage of robots which will bring splendid results, but also elaborate on why it will be impacted hazardous on human life.
To embark with, there are multitude of ways in which robots invest their quality of aid. First and foremost, in medical evolvement, nowadays doctors cannot easily prevent detrimental griefs without rely on technology. Nevertheless, robots would be an essential alternative because they work splendid on brain and heart surgery, as they have splendid technical ability. Additionally, at some chemical organisations, there is a risk of get infected with virus. However, robots will perform any task over there owing to artificially made body. As a result, health of employees will have exceedingly enhanced after development of robots.
Although it is proved that robots will play rational role in human lives, it will be not appropriate anymore because they have many negatives that are not safe and unnecessary to human lives. As a manner of fact, folks cannot be easily search for high paid jobs since robots will be recruited. For example, at five star hospital, if robots will take a place of doctors due to their ability, then doctors family will not be probably fed and survived.
Similarly to previous antagonistic affects, robots will impact on the behaviour of denizens as well. What it is meant to elaborate is that if people get free time then they would prefer to utilise mobile phones which is probably that they will become lethargic. For example, according to the analysis of survey by IIM, more than 70% of public used mobile phones over a half period per day and not willing to work. Eventually, what is facilitate for masses is that, reason to get a lot of pleasure out of using cell phone and this would have been done by robots.
In conclusion, as per the availability
of robots, there will be some pragmatic usage occurred. In contrast, this would not be appropriate individually because of its negatives which are mentions above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-05 | Shakhribonu | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 90
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology to homes in the UK 73
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans
- The process shows how carbon made in the environment 56
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...l not be probably fed and survived. Similarly to previous antagonistic affects, robot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 435, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'facilitated'.
Suggestion: facilitated
...ot willing to work. Eventually, what is facilitate for masses is that, reason to get a lot...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, as per the availability of robots, there will be some pragmatic ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07183908046 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69896432772 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566091954023 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8351234004 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.823529412 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249213473383 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847455830409 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514702780537 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124492723119 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700759602647 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.