It is said that raising the cost of air tickets would reduce the number of people traveling by planes because of damaging issues for the environment. While I partly agree with this tendency, I strongly believe that other measures would be more effective.
On the one hand, increasing air tickets is considered as a solution to address the problems related to the environment. When the cost of air travel is cheap, more people can afford to fly. The growth in popularity of economic airlines proves that cheap air travel would encourage flying. For example, in the UK, after 1996, numerous people booked holiday packets to holiday resorts to get away from it all is increasing because budget airlines offered attractive and affordable prices. Therefore, there is definitely a link between the cost of plane tickets and citizens traveling by plane.
On the other hand, I would contend that other approaches such as introducing renewable energy to the airplane would be more productive. The first reason is that increasing airline tickets just affects the minority of people with low incomes. Individuals living in affluence will travel by plane owing to its fast speed and inconvenience. Secondly, it is obvious that developing cleaner fuels would be more feasible and effective in relation to sustainable development. This would cut down the carbon emissions of aircraft and make a significant contribution to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
In conclusion, although raising the price of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would be environmentally better to concentrate on developing clearer non-polluting fuels for aircraft.
It is said that raising the cost of air tickets would reduce the number of people traveling by planes because of damaging issues for the environment. While I partly agree with this tendency, I strongly believe that other measures would be more effective.
On the one hand, increasing air tickets is considered as a solution to address the problems related to the environment. When the cost of air travel is cheap, more people can afford to fly. The growth in popularity of economic airlines proves that cheap air travel would encourage flying. For example, in the UK, after 1996, numerous people booked holiday packets to holiday resorts to get away from it all is increasing because budget airlines offered attractive and affordable prices. Therefore, there is definitely a link between the cost of plane tickets and citizens traveling by plane.
On the other hand, I would contend that other approaches such as introducing renewable energy to the airplane would be more productive. The first reason is that increasing airline tickets just affects the minority of people with low incomes. Individuals living in affluence will travel by plane owing to its fast speed and inconvenience. Secondly, it is obvious that developing cleaner fuels would be more feasible and effective in relation to sustainable development. This would cut down the carbon emissions of aircraft and make a significant contribution to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
In conclusion, although raising the price of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would be environmentally better to concentrate on developing clearer non-polluting fuels for aircraft.
- The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Although it is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills I think that learning through watching TV is as effective as reading Of course reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers When reading the 73
- Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they are doing while others believe it is not necessary for them Discuss both views and give your own opinion 88
- The bar charts compare how many people in urban and rural areas were affected by noise pollution from four sources during daytime and nightime in 2007 Overall it is clear that more people in cities experienced all types of noise pollution compared with ru 67
- Nowadays numerous young people are less happy even though they have become richer healthier and have longevity While there is a number of underlining reasons for this phenomenon some solutions can be taken to tackle this issue There are two primary reason 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther measures would be more effective. On the one hand, increasing air tickets ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckets and citizens traveling by plane. On the other hand, I would contend that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. In conclusion, although raising the pric...
^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29104477612 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90505623848 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5195113469 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56240469214 0.244688304435 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183214699794 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153078668456 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377732077011 0.151304729494 250% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.263218407647 0.056905535591 463% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther measures would be more effective. On the one hand, increasing air tickets ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckets and citizens traveling by plane. On the other hand, I would contend that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. In conclusion, although raising the pric...
^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29104477612 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90505623848 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5195113469 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56240469214 0.244688304435 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183214699794 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153078668456 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377732077011 0.151304729494 250% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.263218407647 0.056905535591 463% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.