Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than in building a large collection of paper books. To what extend do you agree.
While, majority of the people who believe that in today's era computer and internet cafe's are replace into number of books shelves. I strongly agree with the idea that it is better way for people to search the information easily by technology, I believe that e-books are playing major role in human life.
On the one hand, I feel that number of people who have liked to read the magazine's and pamphlets through paper books than technology. Firstly, a lot of researchers think that rely on technology is no more beneficial especially for students in the contemporary era because sometimes it creates critical issue like slow processing or download, short circut, fall information and adversely effect on eyes. However, paper books are always print by the experts writer and provide the valuable data or experience which are more helpful for students.
On the other hand, the invention of the technology has changed the lifestyle of people and extensive study material is available on online websites which are very easy to collect and download within a seconds fraction of time. Secondly, students who are million of money and time on books, stationary, notebooks and so on in every year than through technology they can easily download or copy the notes. Besides this, according to me now in this era technology is very expensive, with people are easy distract from study by mobile notification and people who are not very affluent then they can not be afford it.
In conclusion, libraries mean sea's knowledge and more concentration place specially for students, on the other hand, if authority are keep the technology inside the library then it natural people more distrub, become to lazy and expand badly noise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | Rachana Parikh | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Eric Liu | 71 | view |
- Scientist predict that all people will choose to talk the same language in the future. Do you think is a positive and negative development. 61
- The two pie chart shows to online shopping sales in Canada from 2005 to 2010. 78
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 81
- In serval years many languages die out. Some say it is not important because if we speak fewer language life would be easier. Do you agree or disagree. 73
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking is banned in certain place so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...ays era computer and internet cafes are replace into number of books shelves. I strongl...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...er, paper books are always print by the experts writer and provide the valuable data or...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'seconds'' or 'second's'?
Suggestion: seconds'; second's
...y easy to collect and download within a seconds fraction of time. Secondly, students wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ion of time. Secondly, students who are million of money and time on books, stationary,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, i feel, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02807017544 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63977670507 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2217101867 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.222222222 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5555555556 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871298316625 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037052583124 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278902022949 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0495087580398 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291201233928 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.