Sometimes, people have to live in a country that does not speak their mother language. Some people opine that this may cause significant social and practical problems. I completely agree with the statement that having to speak foreign language will cause problems in both social and practical matters.
Firstly, the reason why speaking foreign language may create social problem is because language serves as a communication bridge between people. In every communication, from short to long conversations, people are using language to communicate what they want to say. Thus, if someone does not understand the language that most people are using, he will most likely to be isolated from any social group. This can happen in various communities, ranging from workplace to neighborhood. For instance, a guy from United Kingdom moved to Japan and he does not understand Japanese. Whereas, all of his workmates are mostly Japanese and they speak in Japanese, which then lead to him feel isolated and can not do social interaction in his workplace.
Secondly, the reason why speaking foreign language can cause practical problem is because language can not be separated in doing everyday activities. It can be riding public transportation, ordering food menu to reading public signs. All of those activities require understanding of foreign language. Consequently, if people don't understand the language, they will most likely find difficulties in doing his daily activities and face practical problems. For an example, an Americans just moved to Taiwan where most of food menu are written in Mandarin Chinese. Because he does not master Mandarin Chinese, he finds practical problem where he feels difficult to order menu.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the statement that having to speak language that is not our mother language will create problems in both social and practical matters because language serves as a communication bridge between people and language can not be separated in doing everyday activities.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is imp 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...reign language. Consequently, if people dont understand the language, they will most...
^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an (Americans)' or simply 'Americans'?
Suggestion: an (Americans); Americans
...ace practical problems. For an example, an Americans just moved to Taiwan where most of food...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38679245283 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86721585915 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477987421384 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2692578146 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372761349648 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126644048628 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119628287535 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266892438995 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869489810946 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.