Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
Although language can be a barrier when we talk with people who speak a different language, we can quickly adapt ourselves to the new environment and communicating and practical problems may not occur. Thus, I disagree with the statement.
On one hand, there are three ways we can express ourselves. Firstly, postures can replace the words in terms of answering simple questions. Shaking heads usually means no in most countries, whereas we can node heads to tell others the meaning of yes. Secondly, practical problems like eating are easy to cope with. Worldwide brands can be easily found in most parts of the world, such as Seven Eleven where various kinds of food are available. Furthermore, nearly every bus station contains a map about the locations and routes. Hence, handling those problems could not be tough as we imagine.
Besides, with more applications on the smartphone, people can quickly and effectively acquire the fundamental grammar and basic words of a new language so that it won't take long before ordinary people learn to speak the local language. For example, I went to Japan last summer vacation. After downloading an application about Japanese, I could talk in several words in Japanese in the restaurant, and the coffee shop. What's more, even if one is not willing to learn, he can also talk with others via the online interpreter which can automatically translate the words.
All in all, a language unfamiliar to us would not trigger severe problems when we can wisely handle those problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | sepide1367 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | p2312vasant | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | yasamin27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | olParya | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 70
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 78
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to plan and organize. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... questions. Shaking heads usually means no in most countries, whereas we can node ...
^^
Line 4, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...in the restaurant, and the coffee shop. Whats more, even if one is not willing to lea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70192147075 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8807494873 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1428571429 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146106751593 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425050949756 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417565115499 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960231233383 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245982373392 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.