These days, people are fascinated to work in other countries in order to have a better living. It causes not only social obstacles but also practical difficulties that are to be conquered to avoid miscommunication. This essay examines the social and practical hindrances mostly agreeing with the given statement.
Firstly, when we move to a new nation it's quite essential to assimilate with the natives. Having a language barrier can curb you from mingling with the public around you and always intervenes you given the fact that you have to gather information or seek help. For example, you are new to a country and try to make some new friends. In this case, the lack of command over the language can cause discomfort. Thus, there has been a need to incorporate good language knowledge to successfully avoid these hurdles as social grooming is quite important.
Lets put a light on practical hindrances, which are lack of vocabulary to express an idea and to understand others' thoughts. For instance, let's consider the workplace where we have to collaborate with our colleagues in accomplishing assigned tasks. In this situation, you will be unable to exchange ideas with your team members and eventually end up in leaving the work unfinished. These types of problems can only be tackled when someone has already learned the language.
This essay has briefly discussed all the drawbacks related to foreign language. Thus it can be concluded that Communication hurdles are always proven to be devastating for visitors who were there for the first time ever and it is quite necessary to learn the native language.
- Government should put tax on unhealthy food to promote better health Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people find it difficult to speak in front of and to present to an audience It is believed that this skill should be taught in school Why is this important To what extent do you agree or disagree with it 56
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... social grooming is quite important. Lets put a light on practical hindrances, wh...
^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... drawbacks related to foreign language. Thus it can be concluded that Communication...
^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... language. Thus it can be concluded that Communication hurdles are always proven ...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: FIRST_TIME_EVER[1]
Message: Use simply 'first time'.
Suggestion: first time
...ing for visitors who were there for the first time ever and it is quite necessary to learn the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o learn the native language.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10820895522 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83959636736 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6207346175 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245776205346 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745299965505 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533338132429 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131330496669 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679242919958 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.