Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, the environment pollution has been receiving a great deal of social attention. While slowing down non-essential flights seems to be reasonable, I would argue that the restriction of car usage might be more crucial.
On the one hand, there are disadvantages of reducing non-necessary flights whereas the definition of this has not been clear. Firstly, long distance flights make a favorable condition to travel around the world, and this creates culture exchange between nations. As a result, people might easily make friendships and deepen our knowledge including learning new languages, tasting the other countries’ traditional foods. Furthermore, the more business trips are becoming popular, the more significant the development of global trade increases, which gives developing nations a golden chance to attract more foreign investors to improve their economies.
On the other hand, using private car must be limited by the governments to protect our environment immediately. Firstly, due to the fact that a great amount of emissions is released into the atmosphere, the air quality is becoming less pure. As a result, individuals have to face many health problems such as asthma and lung cancer nowadays, which poses a huge threat to the community health. If the governments make a considerable reduction of exhaust fumes, air-related problems will be decreased. Furthermore, when such sulfur dioxide emitted into the air, making a contribution to cause acid rain, and this is the main culprit of soil pollution. Consequently, the contaminated water could dissolve some important nutrients in soil and change the structure of the soil. For example, some places in my country the agricultural farming activities might not bring the effectiveness because of the lack of the soil fertility.
In conclusion, although cutting down long distance flight could be seen as one of the pollution improvements, I believe that the decrease of private car usage from countries is more vital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | nbui2 | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | IVANTRUONG | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- The bar chart compares the figures for 5 different phone brands in terms of sales around the world during a period 4 years. 73
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 77
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 11
- Employers sometimes ask people apply for jobs personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. 89
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...car usage from countries is more vital.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47115384615 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06359124314 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6116021028 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.928571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154981805033 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475281696085 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528655864151 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104666094557 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408849824863 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.