For a long time art has been considered an essential part of all cultures in the world. However, nowadays people’s values have changed, and we tend to consider science, technology and business more important than arts.
What do you think are the causes of this?
What can be done to draw people’s attention to art?
Over the years mankind has recognized the need for the full development in all spheres, bringing thriving in society. In this regard, uneven progress HAS ALWAYS existed in all times and only changed the priority from culture to scientific and technological elaboration and as well as making money. This essay will discuss the main reasons of FOR changing in precedency throw the time and propose some possible solutions for keeping art in sight.
To begin with, the difference in nation needs and social hobbies between generations are considered to be the main causes of changing in human preferences. On the one hand, a creative and liberal human by then was as significant as technologically proved person now. Even “New Your Times” says that science and business are the new culture, which requires imagination and thinking in an individual. On the other hand, the most developed spheres cause by popular doings in its time and changing with it. According to the “Forbes” magazine, in old times every human was not only talking about sculpture and painting but ALSO participating in it itself, which reminds TODAY’S situation about technologies. Hence, fields following after mainstream interests and different requests for specific people from society cause ALTERATIONS in prioritised scopes.
First and foremost, government efforts, directed to the subsidizing art formations and adding more hours in school schedule for music, painting and any creative activity should help the culture popularity. Firstly, sponsoring any art establishments provides higher quality of performance and attracts people to watch them. Secondly, including more creative subjects in children and teenagers education stimulates their interest now and then. Thus, interested in art society and qualitative shows and events will keep culture as one of the popular and important part of humans life.
To sum up, dominance of one field over others in the speed of development, inherent all stages of human extension. As a result, although the national personnel needs and crowd following the most popular trends change priorities, the cultural generations cultivation and art quality will maintain importance of culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-06 | Sumit mirdha | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-18 | Charlotte_Giang_VN | 87 | view |
| 2020-08-18 | sarah830 | 78 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 11
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 56
- Some people prefer to work for a large company Others prefer to work for a small company Which would you prefer 70
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
Over the years mankind has recognized the need for the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this regard, uneven progress HAS ALWAYS existed in all times and only changed th...
^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technological elaboration and as well as making money. This essay will discuss th...
^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...say will discuss the main reasons of FOR changing in precedency throw the time an...
^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enerations are considered to be the main causes of changing in human preferenc...
^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the main causes of changing in human preferences. On the one hand, a creative...
^^^^
Line 2, column 820, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s for specific people from society cause ALTERATIONS in prioritised scopes. Firs...
^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
... trends change priorities, the cultural generations cultivation and art quality will mainta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, talking about, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49853372434 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9026421997 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627565982405 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1135301558 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2680568839 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766764675056 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404823588907 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144274600551 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340447379007 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.