Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
Managing public libraries is a waste of money because sophisticated computer can replace their functions. Not all functions of public libraries can be replaced by computer in this era because coming to a library give many benefits and not all books have already been documented online.
Most people in the world still go to a library to read a book or meet someone to discuss some topics. This condition can also be done on the computer, but there are a lot of problems such as limited time and disturbed signal. This can have some impact on people in developing their academic activities. For example, some developed countries in the east of Asia like Japan and South Korea have focused on developing their education, especially for public libraries in the central place have become the center of discussion for all students. This rule has a positive effect on increasing the number of education quality in these countries.
When it comes to public libraries, most people go to these places to read books since there are considerably different feelings if reading the book on the computer. Reading the books directly can motivate people to finish the book and it is one of the methods to protect the eye from computer radiation. For instance, based on the report from students of Hasanuddin University, Makassar, reading books on the computer has caused some negative effects on young people such as myopic symptoms and fatigue. This situation was linear with decreasing quality of problem-solving in the school. Moreover, some developing countries in Southeast Asia like Cambodia and Myanmar have many cases mentioning that young people who always read books on the computer become an introverted person.
If it is possible this issue has to be attention by all people. People must be aware of all the effects of computer technology, therefore talking about maintaining public libraries have to mix all methods including sophisticated ways to improve the function of the library.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | linh đan | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- There have been many inventions in human history, such as the wheel. Some people think the most important thing is the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on society 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... computer become an introverted person. If it is possible this issue has to be att...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09509202454 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7544594632 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524539877301 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7316176445 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211491440385 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828361500724 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106634574931 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157030862228 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117989066583 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... computer become an introverted person. If it is possible this issue has to be att...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09509202454 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7544594632 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524539877301 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7316176445 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211491440385 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828361500724 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106634574931 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157030862228 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117989066583 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.