Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
The statement claim thaty the major policy decision should be come from the politician and other government exparts because they have better judgement and perspective than the general people. I agree with this statement insofar as the politicians and other government exparts are more expart in the field of decision and policy making. They have more deep knowledge than the general people in terms of policy making and they have practical experiecne on it. The government exparts and the politicians have huge critical thinking abilities than the general people and they can predict and forstall the future occurance. Nonetheless in the society everyone has the rights to share their opinion and provide decision. Only politicians or the others government exparts policy making can make the decision more biased and corrupted. And it also mitigate the democratic value.
First argument in favor of my position is expartise has the value in decision and policy making. The politician and the other government exparts are more expart rather than the general people and they have the proper abilities to take the proper decision. And in any society, everyone's decision like expart and unexpart opinion can make the decision wrong and time consuming and for that the society can be affected badely. So it is better that the policy and decisions are come from the politician and the other government exparts. For example, in amy major decision like to make the highway, there need the government civil engineers and the politicians decision because they know wheather is is better and worthy. But the general people has not the proper knowledge rather than engineers and politicians.
Another argument is the politicians and the other government exparts has the deep knowledge on the particular field to make the major decision because they have the practical experience on it and they have working on it for a long terms. So obviously their decision and policy making will be less polemic than the unexparts. For instants, The government exparts and politician has the proper knowledge on the government annual budget. They know where the budget will need more and where less.Their decision will more likely be successfully rather than if the decision will come from the unexpart.
Moreover, The politician and the other government exparts have the critical thinking abilities than the general people and they can predict the fulture and also can forestall the denger.
However, in the society, there are everyone has the right to provide their decision and everyone's opinion are valuable for decision making. This will ensure everyone's need and less likely to do biased and predilection. If the major decisions are come from the government exparts and the plitician then there are more likely to do the decision biased and one group of people will take the more opportunity than others. And for this there will be create the disparate.
In teh society, everyone has the different perspective and when the decision will be thought from different perspective then teher are more likely the decision and teh policy will be right. And this also increase the democratic value in the society.
In conclusion, in the major decision and the policy making, the politicians and teh other government exparts decision are more valueable and obviously it is necessary to come the decision from them but it will necessary to keep in mind the general people decisions and need to think from different perspective. Filtering the decision and opinion of general public and use the expertise value of the politician, the decision should be come. But for some decisions like the contry's security, the miitary and other's screate decision should mask from the general people.
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself 50
- The graph below shows a conference hall built in 1981 and planned for 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 50
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in the industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...nd perspective than the general people. I agree with this statement insofar as th...
^
Line 1, column 740, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ovide decision. Only politicians or the others government exparts policy making can ma...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...ans decision because they know wheather is is better and worthy. But the general peop...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are (everyone)'?
Suggestion: there are (everyone)
... the denger. However, in the society, there are everyone has the right to provide their decision...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
.... Filtering the decision and opinion of general public and use the expertise value of the poli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 51.0 10.4138276553 490% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3149.0 1615.20841683 195% => OK
No of words: 610.0 315.596192385 193% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16229508197 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96972615649 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58386919278 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.306557377049 0.561755894193 55% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1020.6 506.74238477 201% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9194889051 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.62962963 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5925925926 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38685658604 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142563393225 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989348972184 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237586098342 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865006866263 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.