Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?
Technological developments made our lives much easier these days. New medicines and procedures are being developed to fight diseases that were thought to be incurable. Nowadays, people are being given vaccines in advance to prevent the chance of being effected from various diseases in future. This lead to the vaccination of children as major importance. I personally think vaccination to children by parents should be made compulsory by the law for common diseases. But the government should make the vaccines be available at reasonable prices.
Children require special care and administration as they are less immune to many diseases. So, when there is an outbreak of a disease then children are vaccinated to make them immune towards the disease. In some cases, children are vaccinated at a specified age to protect them from being affected from any diseases. But there are still many deaths of children caused by common diseases. One of the major cause for this is parents not vaccinating their children. So the government should pass strict rules to parents regarding the vaccination for common diseases.
There are some parents who cannot vaccinate their children because of their poverty. The government should take necessary steps to overcome this situation. Someways might be reducing the cost of vaccines for poor people. The government can also supply the vaccine at free cost to orphanages. It should also create awareness among parents about the advantages of vaccination.
In conclusion, the government should take all the necessary measures like passing laws, providing vaccines to poor people, etc. This will help in increasing the children's immunity towards common diseases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | reswanth | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | thassaralah | 61 | view |
| 2017-04-24 | zeebrah | 56 | view |
| 2017-04-22 | zeebrah | 56 | view |
| 2016-10-09 | winstoncheng | 67 | view |
- Claim: The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville prove that Corporateville is a superior place to live then Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp’s current headquarters. Moreover, M 42
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously? 56
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...of being effected from various diseases in future. This lead to the vaccination of childr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... they are less immune to many diseases. So, when there is an outbreak of a disease then ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, still, then, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40977443609 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80645833357 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556390977444 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.7567363828 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7368421053 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308465853671 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106394108007 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621257336623 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194555482886 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743201957867 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.