In many cities, planners have separated schools, homes, shops, cities into specific areas which are widely separated from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for the city resident or it is the opposite? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In urban areas around the world, many schools, shops have been widely separated into particular places, which are far away from each other by government. This essay will discuss that whether this policy brings benefits more than drawbacks to citizens and demonstrate my personal view on this idea.
There are a number of significant benefits to separating public services. First of all, this can contribute good environment to residents. People will have a better place to live and this also improve their personal health. Their children can study and play better in school areas. For example, separating schools can make students stay away from noise and emission from factory. In addition, people who live in these residential areas can prevent from exhaust fume of means of transport like cars, trucks… Furthermore, this policy actually builds a convenient life for many locals. With rising of department stores and complex buildings, residents can easily access to a wide range of goods in just one place.
Despite this, one commonly cited disadvantage of separating areas is that it takes much amount of our time. This is because the farther these areas are from each other, the more time we spend commuting between these places. For instance, in Ho Chi Minh City, the area called “university village”, which consists of many branches of universities and colleges, is so far from the city center that pupils are usually tired of commuting to these place, although these places have better education infrastructure to learn. Eventually, this program places a greater strain on economy. Larger number of specific areas requires more facilities to be built to accommodate them such as roads, bridges and gas stations…
In conclusion, although there are many negative sites on this idea, the positive ones of this policy can be denied. On balance, I would argue that government just needs to divide some main public services like schools and factory and keep some convenient ones in a residential area such as stores, hospital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-15 | SOJI | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | TriNguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | DIEU PHUONG | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 66 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The most important aim of science is to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many cities planners have separated schools homes shops cities into specific areas which are widely separated from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for the city resident or it is the opposite Discuss both 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18787878788 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63724123324 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8490435789 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.133333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29964964081 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892850966227 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610718833799 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173245563922 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648361313897 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.