Many companies invest their money in sports games for advertisement purposes. Some people think it is good for the sports world, while others believe that it has some disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The trend towards allocating resources to advertisement in sport industry is gaining popularity in the business world. Notwithstanding the commercial benefits for economic entities and financial advantages for sport games organizers, I contend that this is partially a negative development and directly affects the purity of sports.
For one thing, the heavy investment from private organizations has eliminated many financial constraints for the match creators in many aspects. Specialized sports equipment such as sportgears and sportswear are now sponsored by private sectors, who could also be actively involved in upgrading sport amenities such as stadiums. This could offer the spectators a sense of satisfaction while immersing in the sporting spirits of live matches with comfortable seats and fulfilled services from snacks bars to souvenir shops. Label in billboards around the arenas or product placement such as on players' uniforms could instill in the viewers the brand’s name, which is beneficial to the businesses’ reputation during market expansion. The co-operations bring about tremendous financial merits for both sides, not to mention the spectators' joy and pleasure.
For another, I still hold the view that mass collaborations with individual companies could entail a reduction in focus on the actual sport. The inherent intangible purposes of traditional sports games are aimed at players’ happiness when reaching the pinnacle of sports and cultivating the spirit of teamwork or competitive attitudes towards others. However, the rapid commercialization has turned matches and events into opportunities to advertise products and promote brand awareness. Viewers’ experiences are now disturbed with brightful players’ jerseys or advertisement bombardments by numerous posters around the stadium. Players are also profit driven when celebrity endorsement is a lucrative industry for them and also an opportunity to enhance their images. Conversely, this could affect their sporting spirit and their professionalism in the matches comparing the salary of a sportsman with an illustrious star and result in poor quality games for viewers.
To conclude, regardless of the financial benefits for the organizers, I believe the true value of sports could be threatened by commercialization. There should be a limit on advertising in order to maintain the spirit of sports to raise public awareness of keeping fit via sporting activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-26 | sonnn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 89 | view |
- Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer However research shows that while people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before What does 78
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 56
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer However research shows that while people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before What does 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, so, still, while, such as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7967032967 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23388875335 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601648351648 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3906174446 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283747948541 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933605357517 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494023906482 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17592440827 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198373152303 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.