Many countries apply to be the host of an international sporting competition such as Olympics but only one is ever chosen What are the benefits for a country of hosting an international sports competition Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvant

Many international sports events were held in different nations, such as the Olympics or the world cup in South Africa. Despite being well-known by sports lovers worldwide, other people think it exerts a detrimental effect on their daily life aspects and finances. In my opinion, the second statement partially convinced me for some reasons.
On the one hand, holding an international event such as the world cup could benefit the hosted nation and the citizens. There would be more job opportunities for the unemployed because preparing a large-scale event required a lot of human resources. Furthermore, the event could stimulate the development of the economy and an excellent chance to be well-known globally. For example, South Africa organized the world cup in 2010, and there was a famous MV “Waka Waka” on youtube to advertise this event. After that, South Africa's economy and tourism rose dramatically after a year.
On the other hand, the drawback of an international event is similar to the hidden part of floated ice. It cannot be seen easily and hidden as detrimental to a nation’s budget. For instance, the Olympics held by an anonymous government cost a lot to be well-prepared, from the workforce to financial condition. Hence, that country is likely to be in debt that cannot be loaned within years but decades because money is the critical point to hold this enormous scale sports event.
In conclusion, hosting an international sport could stimulate a country’s economy and tourism. However, that nation could bear a substantial financial burden that will take time to be paid.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Waka
...cup in 2010, and there was a famous MV “Waka Waka” on youtube to advertise this event. Af...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16091954023 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91451282231 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0256869497 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269765203507 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957417203233 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893808243301 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17318397352 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293511238974 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Waka
...cup in 2010, and there was a famous MV “Waka Waka” on youtube to advertise this event. Af...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16091954023 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91451282231 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0256869497 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269765203507 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957417203233 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893808243301 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17318397352 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293511238974 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.