In many countries around the world, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water pollution and land pollution, so they should be banned.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the major kinds of discarded waste materials in most countries around the globe is plastic shopping bag. While the use of it makes life more convenient, some people argue that the utilization and disposal give rise to water pollution and land pollution; on that account it should be prohibited. In my opinion, I completely agree with this proposal.
The accumulation of plastic shopping bag usage consequently leads not only limited to water and land pollution, but as well as air pollution. Moreover, it poses as an environmental hazard, increasing the risk of health issues. For an instance, one small plastic bag takes about hundred or thousands of years to fully decompose if it is non biodegradable and approximately one to two years if biodegradable. Under these circumstances, if there are ten billion people and each one is using an average of two bags per day, it would be six hundred billion of plastic bags in a month.
The way how these plastic bags was manufactured presents a threat for global warming. The smoke being emitted by the factories for the production depletes the ozone layer, and it plays a huge role in greenhouse effect. In addition to this, most of the people in some countries were not concerned and aware about our environment and opt to burning these plastics as the fastest way to discard it. In other words, this thing will clearly jeopardize the environment and wellness of everyone.
In conclusion, the use of plastic bags obviously has more negative outcome rather than positive outcome. Furthermore, eradicating the use of it in our daily lives would be beneficial to the environment and to our health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | iamkristinjoi | 89 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 73
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think that teenage years are the happiest times of most people’s lives. Other’s think that adult life brings more happiness in spite of greater responsibilities. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Young people prefer listening to music rather than listening to the news on the radio Is this a positive or a negative trend 91
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ance, one small plastic bag takes about hundred or thousands of years to fully decompos...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ronment and wellness of everyone. In conclusion, the use of plastic bags obv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0071942446 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91007861201 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597122302158 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5220765405 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.076923077 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190217239419 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644525103608 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570783873106 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114296477489 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629166996889 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.