In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In recent years many governments have faced the problem that people who live in villages move to urban. According to some, it has a bad effect on the population of that area, and their density declines by passing time. I think this is a positive development for a country which makes it get promoted.
On the one hand people who live in rural areas don’t have a lot of facilities to improve their skills, knowledge, and careers and decided to move their nearest city or a capital city. Because they want to use different facilities which is located in cities. For instance, in countryside places there is not any university, school, football clubs, and so on because these the young generation moving to capital cities. Although elderly people have more tendency to live in their hometown and do agriculture their children don’t think so. Hence, the population of rural cities decrease by passing the time and just old men and elderly people stay there.
On the other hand, by moving to new place in new city you learn a lot of things and experience different challenges that you don’t have before. For example, you have to rent an apartment or home and earn money solely, faced with people who cannot trust and so on. The urban life has these problems and challenges. Not only cannot you see your parents like before but also, you have to work than before sometimes should stay back at work for earning money. This makes you a person who has various skills, extend of experience and, promote rapidly. Therefore, moving to another city or to a capital city has it’s problems but has many benefits for your future life.
In conclusion, it is true that by moving people to cities the density of rural areas drop but who are stay there provide agriculture yields which is so important for a society and who are moving to other cities have this opportunity for promoting themselves.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows he quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant 78
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...their density declines by passing time. I think this is a positive development fo...
^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: APARTMENT-FLAT[1]
Message: This word is common for American English. Did you mean 'flat'?
Suggestion: flat
...efore. For example, you have to rent an apartment or home and earn money solely, faced wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s opportunity for promoting themselves.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75075987842 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45282539102 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51367781155 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7001711154 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31729686514 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100398944381 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632358954061 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193987826539 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217163008647 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.