In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development.
In a myriad of nations around the globe, people living in the countryside have a prevalent tendency to flock to urban areas which results in the reduction in the countryside’s population. In this essay, I would evaluate the positivity and negativity of this development before proposing whether it is beneficial or detrimental to our society.
On the other hand, there are several drawbacks that is associated with the tendency of migration to urban areas. First, this trend will make the cities become overloaded with a huge density of population because of inadequate facilities and infrastructures which will cause numerous challenges to living conditions such as traffic congestion as rush hour and numerous kinds of pollution, especially air pollution and noise pollution. Taking Ho Chi Minh City as a typical example, this city has been reported to be one of the most contaminated cities in Viet Nam due to the overpopulation when people from distinctive regions move to there for a settlement. Additionally, it will be difficult for the local government to control over their residents which can result in the increasing number of crimes in and pose threat to all inhabitants among the cities.
However, the benefits of urban areas are undeniable which can enable migrants to develop remarkably. Chief among that is creating more job opportunities for people from remote areas to enhance their career path which can enrich the workforce of the metropolitans to catch up with the rapid industrialization in contemporary society, so it will pave the way for people from remote areas to be employed by prestigious organizations and reach numerous successful achievements in the future. Moreover, when migrating to cities, people will be facilitated to improve their living condition with the assistance of modern devices and artificial tools that help people to multiple tasks without any troubles in daily life.
In conclusion, even though cities bring several benefits for individuals from rural areas, the negative overwhelms the positive with inevitable disadvantages which results in difficulties for both city dwellers and migrants to face.
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ountryside’s population. In this essay, I would evaluate the positivity and negat...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1151303301 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.1877394812 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.0 106.682146367 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188449385139 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727682915222 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553112534528 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124584921585 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517342859942 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.0946893788 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.