There is a contentious debate surrounding the issue of the children working throughout the globe in this era. Some people firmly believe that this trend is morally wrong. On the flip side, others persistently consider involvement of kids in some sort of paid work as a precious in case of gaining adequate experiences and learning. To me, the idea of the former party seems more appealing. Not only would children working have detrimental effects on children education, but it would also contribute to negative effects on their upbringing.
On the one hand, it is widely said that education is one of the most vital factors in children life. Accordingly, it would definitely influence their future in different aspects. So, it would be transparently viable as long as they allocate a majority of their time to studying. For example, recent survey of the X University has indisputably revealed the effectiveness of this issue. The survey illustrates that 60 percent of the young student who have been working and studying simultaneously couldn’t achieve a satisfactory result in the final exams in long term.
On the other hand, when it comes to children personality formation or their attitudes, everyone claim that the early period of life play an immense role in children characteristics. Being regularly in the workplaces and have direct contact with outside atmosphere no matter how hazardous they are, children are more susceptible to immoral and illegal issues. Although they would support themselves and their family financially, they somehow jeopardize their perspective personal morality. For instance, one of the statistics of the X municipality adeptly indicates that 50 percent of the adults who have worked from the little age until now are addicted to chemical drugs.
To sum up, it would be wise if government and also parent protect more children by their patronage. In addition, they should have better co-operation that let them study regardless of thinking of financial obstacles. Though challenging children by undertaking full-time works would make them familiar with future responsibilities and burden of the occupations, it’s disadvantages extremely outweigh it’s advantages.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 96
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 55
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xtremely outweigh it's advantages.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, sort of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48405797101 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08192963501 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617391304348 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6700972789 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.294117647 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160820444247 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524436562526 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561842981574 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102509392775 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815912134735 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.