In our modern life, private schools which called 'cram schools' are attached for supplementary coaching in test-taking techniques by students in many various countries. Some people think that taking part in this type of schools require more money and that can be financially damaging. However, in my opinion, there are pros and cons to doing this.
Let's begin by looking at advantages to attend 'cram schools'. In some countries, schools may not be provide good knowledge, so attending extra classes can help students do the tests well. In addition, they can learn more in 'cram schools' than what they learn in school. Turning to the other side of this, going to extra classes a lot can be an extra expense, because currently, 'cram schools'require much money in schools where tuition is not paid. That's why people do not prefer this type of schools.
Another issue is that it is possible to enter good universities by attending additional classes. In other words, some students spend a lot of time on themselves when they go to 'cram schools'. This does not mean that students will not be able to enter university with the knowledge they have learned in school. It's just that some students take school lessons irresponsibly because they have free classes. That's why private and paid schools are opening in some developed countries.
All things considered, it has both advantages and disadvantages to attend private 'cram schools' for extra coaching in test-taking techniques. Although more people do not prefer this type of schools. Personally that cannot be a lot of financially damaging.
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries students attend private cram schools for extra coaching in test taking techniques What is your view of this practice 56
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The diagram below shows how raw materials are used to make plastic products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ere are pros and cons to doing this. Lets begin by looking at advantages to atten...
^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...y in schools where tuition is not paid. Thats why people do not prefer this type of s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...onsibly because they have free classes. Thats why private and paid schools are openin...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tra coaching in test-taking techniques. Although more people do not prefer this type of ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, well, in addition, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06488549618 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71193614124 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530534351145 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0919426355 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9375 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374747642748 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120181090789 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105234000264 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255478314216 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642038381392 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.