In many countries today, people buy a range of household goods (television, microwave, oven and rice cookers). Is it a positive or negative development?
In recent years, thank to the outburst of technology, a huge number of household supplies are invented, such as rice cookers, ovens, televisions or microwaves, which have become an indispensable part of our daily life. From my perspective, this development brings both pros and cons to not only individual but also environmental level.
Initially, the increasing number of state-of-the-art inventions make our life more convenient and heighten the living standard. Instead of consuming a huge amount of time for household chores, inhabitants can put more concentration on work and study, or pursue their own passions, therefore more chances for promoting at work could be gained. For example, dishwashers support humans in doing the dishes after meals, or washing machine helps users in reducing efforts put on clean clothes. As a result, the more time they can save from doing housework, the more money and achievements they can reach, and it benefits both individuals and society.
On the other hand, producing technological productions has adverse impacts on the environment. It is proven that the process of making new devices discharges a significant number of pollutants to the surroundings, not only affecting human health but also gradually leading to serious environmental issues, such as the most noticeable problem in recent years is global warming. Besides, the technological outbreak also results in the dependence of some people on these supplies. A number of people can not live independently from automatic gadgets due to the fact that they have no basic skills. If these people are put into a situation that does not have modern technology, they will find it hard to adapt and survive.
In conclusion, the growth in household applications consumption has benefited our life apparently, however, those downsides are also having to be considered deliberately.
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people say History is one the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show a cafe 10 years ago 5 years ago and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'applications'' or 'application's'?
Suggestion: applications'; application's
... In conclusion, the growth in household applications consumption has benefited our life appa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40816326531 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12458243774 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1971708979 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.06477573047 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233253397315 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240613210132 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431191691816 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283795822054 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.