Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development?
Many countries make use of non-renewable natural resources to supply their energy demands while others challenge the convention by encouraging people to consume alternative resources. In my opinion, this change is a good start that enables people to achieve sustainable goals.
The consumption of traditional fossil fuels emits a large amount of carbon dioxide that can speed up the global warming process. Carbon dioxide is one of the main greenhouse gases that retain radiations from the sun. A large amount of this gas in the atmosphere is one of the preconditions for heat interactions. Reducing the sources of this greenhouse gas can lessen radiations from the sun, retarding global warming. Therefore, sustainable development can be ensured if people change their behaviours regarding their energy resources consumed.
When people make use of fossil fuels, they have to extract these resources from natural landscapes. The extraction of these resources can create negative impacts on the environment. For example, pumping oil out of reservoirs may reform the formation of soil strata under the ground. The change of soil and rock formations may encourage the eruption of inactive volcanos that have hibernated for thousands of years. These activities can be the starting points of many earthquakes that can create tragedies for people who live near these areas. Therefore, they can destroy human habitats, forcing people into poverty and starvation problems.
Finally, combusting fossil fuels releases toxic chemicals that affect the health of human. Emissions from conventional fuels contain mercury that can create serious health problems for women who are pregnant. The inhalation of this toxic chemical leads to the deformity of their babies. Thus, traditional energy resources can also cause health problems for people.
In short, switching from fossil fuels to other alternative resources is a good way for people to achieve their development goals for decades to come.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | Toai Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Toai Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | Toai Nguyen | 73 | view |
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 73
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 73
- "Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 84
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 73
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating together is important to people in your country? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51147540984 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80525479194 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544262295082 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.003886323 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3888888889 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142956582752 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448007975802 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335234592576 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848812507378 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259076694284 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.