Many criminals re-offend after they have been punished. Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
Crimes have spoiled millions of human lives. In many cases, people that have been imprisoned commit illegal actions after they are out of a jail. This essay will discuss the main reason for re-offending crimes as well as provide a feasible solution for this issue.
If an individual is caught performing forbidden activities, a society usually stamps criminal as an undesirable participant. Therefore, once a prisoner is free, they face a number of troubles connected to reintegration to the society. Most of the employees refuse to hire a person that has been accused in committing any crime even after decades. Moreover, most of the population prefer to keep a social distance from such people, making a friendship for former criminals to be hard to obtain. All these reasons lead them to continue to perform illegal activities again and again. In other words, the social distancing to prevent criminals to become a valuable part of a society.
In order to overcome the above-mentioned problem, the primary goals for the judicial system should be a reintegration of people that have made a mistake rather than punish them. If a person would be given a second chance and the society would want to provide this chance, individuals who were prisoners in the past would have all social capabilities. Since ordinary life is more beneficial and safe than the lifestyle of a criminal, the majority of human beings would stop committing restricted actions. According to the United Nations report, the fraction of re-offending crimes is significantly smaller due to the fact, that the main desire of their jail system is the reintergration of every person who appears there.
In conclusion, this essay highlighted the main reason for the phenomenon and suggested a viable solution.
- People who read for pleasure have better imagination and reading skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extent do you agree 61
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graphs compared Japan and Malaysia in terms of five categories of average family expenses in 2010 78
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion 84
- Many believe that there should be few restrictions on the office buildings and homes that people can build in cities while others think the designs should be limited Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in many cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15172413793 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.908055972 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0012147541 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28502199689 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084917939622 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807738029746 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152466829267 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103381727622 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.