Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home As a result employees will have more flexible hours in the future Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home. As a result, employees will have more flexible hours in the future. Is this a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, with the advancement of technology, employers can give their staff various benefits. The major benefit is allowing them to remote work which is greatly proliferated in many countries across the world. From my perspective, it is more beneficial for employees to work from home.
The first and foremost positive point is that employees save time and money when they perform their official duties from home because when they go to work they need to spend more time and money for traveling. Firstly, with more time thanks to working remotely allow telecommuters to pursue their hobbies. Since the time they spend in the car while driving to the office can be used in having some exercise or having some delicious breakfast before they start their working day. As a result, telecommuters tend to be more active and healthy. Moreover, it is allowing employees to save more money. Due to not having to go to the office and having outside lunch. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC News revealed that the majority of telecommuters are able to save 18% of their salary which was spent on transport and lunch.
In addition to this, it is also believed that workers stay in harmony with their families when they work from home. They can have more time to share love and play with their children. Moreover, with happiness life employees can improve their work efficiency. For example, a report from the UN in 2018 shows that people who work remotely are more happy and more prosperous in their life and work than those who go daily to the office.
In conclusion, people who work from home get more value both mentally and physically which can help improve their work efficiency and quality of life. Therefore, I totally agree that is a most positive development.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-22 snowacealex 56 view
2023-03-22 snowacealex 56 view
Essays by user snowacealex :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86092715232 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5264965759 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516556291391 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0336795905 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307652451665 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112928384875 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588760593526 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20515965569 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308688720586 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.