Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Many museums and historical landmarks are among the most popular destination for foreign travellers, however, this is contrary to the local dwellers. There are a number of causes of this, and a variety of methods that can be used to tackle this problem.
To begin with, visiting museums and traditional places is considered the shortest way to learn the culture of each country. Museums and old sites in a separate nation are the areas to preserve the long-standing cultural values of the country and the quintessence of humanity. Therefore, it is easy to know why museums and ancient locations are always on the list of destination when a person travels in another region. For example, in 2018, the world's largest museum, the Louvre attracted about 10 million foreigners coming to see. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned tourist spots do not actually seduce aboriginal because they hardly change over time. As a result, locals may feel that there is nothing new to learn after their initial visit. Secondly, in countries low-income rates, locals may not be able to afford to pay trips to expensive museums and historical places.
In order to attract more local residents, famous sites of interest should evolve over time. For instance, the Japanese have applied technological video to tourists can watch more easily at Osaka castle, the screen system each on each floor will show different stories through each period, each character is reproduced very vividly and it can be said that an individual who went from the bottom to the top of the tower can memorize the whole history. In addition, museums can adjust their ticket price so that all walks of society can buy. For example, the Uffizi Gallery in England has its collection updated every year and has set specific days on which it will have free entrance for everyone to commemorate and honour special historical and traditional occasions. This has increased the number of customers, especially those that are local.
In conclusion, I think that museums and historical areas which do not attract locals are often too expensive or unchanging. To resolve this, costs should be reduced for local citizen and new things also should be added to avoid boredom.
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 89
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: worlds the largest
...other region. For example, in 2018, the worlds largest museum, the Louvre attracted about 10 m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08493150685 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67305733269 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3715571141 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324532242304 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098039264814 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458179269763 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191896866521 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166119201683 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.