Although an increasing number of historical museums typically charge an admission fee whereas there are others which are completely free. In my opinion, I think that admissibility fees can produce more benefits compared to the possible disadvantages it might bring.
Admittedly, there are some merits that a museum enjoys when visitors are been charged before accessing the museum. Firstly, they appreciate the value of their money. In other words, they appreciate and cherish the collections inside the museum. This disciplines them that something that has a price possesses a value. Secondly, despite the museum receiving funding from the government, the generated revenue from the admission charges can be used for its upkeep as well as to fund other community projects such as the construction of local roads and public places. Thus, not only the individuals but also society enjoy in the long-term.
Nevertheless, despite the advantages above, the art-gallery certainly could face some drawback if entrance tickets are sold. One potentially dangerous problem is that it will limit certain groups of people exploring such historical places. For instance, the primary role of the museum is to sufficiently educate its visitors, however, enforcing fees might prevent students and children from gaining unrestricted access. As a result, this typically limits them from learning and acquiring knowledge about the historical places and its contents which might be useful for their future. Another obvious issue is that visitors and tourists are deprived of the unique opportunity to purchase souvenirs or visit the museums' restaurants. For this reason, it will significantly reduce the income generated in the museum.
In conclusion, appreciating the value of services and revenue generation from imposed admissibility fees far offsets any of the considerable disadvantages that could result from visiting a museum. I believe it should not be free for all so as to be operated and developed effectively.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that they can make as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled 83
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...I believe it should not be free for all so as to be operated and developed effectively.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53246753247 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94923884798 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0649096739 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8125 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325850422914 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904777751011 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706559316193 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196150352659 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450684616446 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.