Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages

Some exhibition in the museums nowadays ask their visitors to pay for the entrance, but there are also many museums that do not charge anything. It arises a query that which woud be better, paying for tickets or going for free ?
Enjoying without any fee would definitely be beneficial for the majority who witnesses the art work for entertainment and experience only. It means most of people coming to those museums tend to have a simple goal that they want to absorb the civilization value of the world. If they go to some precious places containing a huge devotation left by many generations but lose nothing, they will be gleeful to visit without hesitation.
On the other hand, when we look at the terms of real displays for real visitors, it would be another story. It is carefully considered that there are many guests having more complex purpose to be charged at museums. Some of them might be artists who are willing to see directly by their eyes and analyse the displays in delication and elaboration. Furthermore, because this is the place where generates all of skillful and artistic work with the authors around the globe and in many ages, it is worth to have genuine audience who are pleased to pay and watch them with entire honour and respect.
In conclusion, although the number of guests to charging museums is in decline compared to free museums, I assure that the humanity value these museums bring to authors and audience would outweigh the deficit of visitor limit.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...rtainment and experience only. It means most of people coming to those museums tend to have a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80544747082 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54236680844 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0739238293 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259000097692 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101784036894 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086342803178 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172125190798 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914353078153 0.056905535591 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.