Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

In today's world people more interest to visit museums and the historical exhibitions rather than the past, accordingly many galleries open their doors to the public for free while the other not, in my belief there are many benefits in charging people to visit the museums.

On the bright side, museums are collecting objects from all over the world and sometimes they have to buy those objects from private owners or governments. For example, a Private owner maybe has an antique object from a specific period of time like the peace of porcelain plate from China with handmade painting on it, so museum need a month of money to buy such beautiful object from the collector or antique dealer to put them in the museum for showing to the public. In addition,
it is helping to improve society's interact with the community when they pay money to visit events in museums. For instance, famous museums like Louvre, Metropolitan or national Museum of Egypt they are not free to visit for the public they need this money to expand their collection and throwing huge galleries in order to raise money for charities like Gallas party in New York City which is through by Metropolitan museum every year.

Last but not least, the security system is the most important issue for their museum's managers and updating the system every year is necessary. Obviously, the museum has priceless collections and object inside them, painting from famous artists like Leonardo da Vinci or van Gogh so they need a high technology system to protect them from robbery and damaging during the visit time.

On the negative side, people who live in a city that has a big museum sometimes avoid to go to the museum because of the entrance price which in there believe it is not fair. As an illustration, people who have always been enthusiastic about free events like concerts, theater and they prefer a spend their money on something else instead pay to visit an old dusty object from the past.

In conclusion, although there are side effects on taking money for public to visiting of museums like losing people interest to art and human history, in my opinion, the benefits are more for local communities and private sector who run such a place, in order to keep them safe and appreciate the artist and history of world, people should pay money to visit the museums.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e has an antique object from a specific period of time like the peace of porcelain plate from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 81, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid going', 'avoid gonna'.
Suggestion: avoid going; avoid gonna
... a city that has a big museum sometimes avoid to go to the museum because of the entrance p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 294, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... like concerts, theater and they prefer a spend their money on something else instead p...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reciate the artist and history of world, people should pay money to visit the mus...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80740740741 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39817031307 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501234567901 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.2975951904 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.2270890775 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.7 106.682146367 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.5 20.7667163134 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228723192059 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100386734166 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617499994422 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133487029919 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412929415958 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.0946893788 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.1190380762 178% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.