In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of a large, extended family. Is this a positive or negative trend?
A question many of us have to ask ourselves is whether sharing the roof with a group of family members is more comfortable than having a place of our own. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that staying in a small-size household can be a way to fend off hassles from the others. On the other hand, hardly can we deny that having more people around, especially your flesh and blood, means we have someone to lean on during times of hardship.
To assess if a person is suitable for living on his own or just with his partner, we must bring the advantages of this lifestyle into focus. A primary one is a freedom to make personal growth, as well as preference, a top priority instead of being affected by the other family members’ judgments. Assuming an individual is financially independent, he can make his own decisions on a whim without hesitation. Not only will he avoid being a burden for his family, but he can also put all his efforts into picking up life skills, which is absolutely going to be worthwhile down the road. Another beneficial characteristic of small family units is having no curfews, which might violate the liberty and privacy of a person.
Although so far, a person can readily draw the conclusion that the aforementioned lifestyle is better than the traditional way of living, we must put the benefits of a close-knit family into perspective before judging. Living together under the same roof, the family members are willing to lend each other a helping hand. For instance, parents go the extra mile and even sacrifice their own happiness for the sake of their children. On top of that, when a sickness leaves us bedridden, your kins are the only ones who you can count on to be there for you. Although it is true that your closest friends may visit and bring you gift baskets, they will leave when it is their turn to take care of their own family. Only then will you appreciate the fact that nothing comes before family.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that it all comes down to everyone’s perspectives and perspectives when it comes to starting a family. From where I stand, I suppose I have enough capabilities to live by myself.
- There is no need to go out to see live cinema because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers while others prefer local markets What are the advantages of each Which shopping experience do you prefer 95
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 94
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of them is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
... lifestyle into focus. A primary one is a freedom to make personal growth, as well as pre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...small family units is having no curfews, which might violate the liberty and priv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, i suppose, as well as, it is true, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64795918367 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68147558792 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2067177234 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102990953606 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363211060152 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411973360051 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575179772077 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274780879895 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.