Many newspapers, magazines and television programmes make money by reporting on the private lives of public figures such as politicians, sports personalities and entertainers. while the media's right to freedom of expression should be defended, the media should not intrude into people's private affairs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that celebrities such as sports person, entertainment actors and city officials person are often covered by media for their private concerned. Nonetheless, Some people argue that introduction of such people’s private life ought not to be entertained by media person despit it is subject to freedom of desclaimer. This essay will discuss both side of aspects.
There are persuasive arguments in favor of introduction into private life of such celebrities. To commence with, It is sometime said that fans of such personalities wanted to look into their personal life to determine how they are in real life since most people may follow trends genereated by celebrities without knowing the truth. For example, How they behave with other fans and how they maintain personal relationship in spite of busy schedule. Secondly, it is widely believed that although the media should present facts to people, they would have only interest to make a living by earning TRP owing to people’s tendancy to look into famous personalitites. Finally, it is often point out that sometimes personalities may look for positive publicity or earn prestige to make more fans by doing some charity in front of media.
The arugments against media’s tendency to look into people’s private affairs.
Firstly, it is suggested that some people may not want to explore their personal life to world and media has no rights to do this despite freedom of reports. Secondly, Maybe media specifically target some celebrities to report false narative news to people owing to their personal revange, or to make other celbs profile to be lifted. Lastly, it is often thought that personal opinion of media would impose on public in the name of news report.
To recapitulate, Although there are strong reason mentioned above in against of media’s interfear in people’s private life, sometime it may give them prestige for their personal affairs. Personally, I tend to deem that media ought to make balace to make their geniun report to public.
- ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health an on society Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for the 67
- The below gives information about trends in Internet use by the females in the USA in two years 61
- The chart below shows attitudes towards culture and cultural activities in New Zealand 73
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years and there are few places which are affected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that it is essential to include Physical Education classes in the curriculum for all school age children Other think that children s time is better spent on more academic subjects Discuss both view and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'officials'' or 'official's'?
Suggestion: officials'; official's
...s person, entertainment actors and city officials person are often covered by media for t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 368, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ifted. Lastly, it is often thought that personal opinion of media would impose on public in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16363636364 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75084092661 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524242424242 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6001474352 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27760880096 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112380687497 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620294737699 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175757581825 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527789881499 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.