Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
A country's history is embodied in a large number of legally protected historic buildings. Some believe they ought to be demolished and replaced with modern ones. This essay will outline the importance of it, however, it should stand without improvement and progress.
First of all, it is obvious that preserving certain old buildings provides historical value of a nation to be passed down for future generations. Undoubtedly, it shows us how people live and survive in the past that supports modern people gaining a deeper understanding and utilizing it as a basic foundation of knowledge. The pyramid of giza construction, primarily slow-setting mortar, gives engineers inspiration to implement in present days. Furthermore, it can be developed as a heritage destination, escalating socio-economy aspects through worldwide tourism. For instance, Paris has a lot of historical buildings and receives greater regional income over a hundred USD every year.
Conversely, modernization of heritage buildings cannot be discouraged as this can achieve its sustainability to mitigate casualties from various disasters. Considering that, most worldwide ancient building structures have been renovated to be well-designed, reducing accidents of the collapse of buildings to residents. Moreover, this revitalization may foster a wider building purpose to enhance their existence. The extensive periodic control of Colosseum has shaped the structure getting better maintained in which it becomes a great fit for every occasion and function, transforming from amphitheater to a beautiful place for pre-wedding photoshoots.
In summary, it seems to me that maintaining old buildings brings more positive impacts including saving long-term historical value and generating area revenues. Meanwhile, the renovation of such structures can also be implemented to prevent building damage and engage in more functional prospects.
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think the government should take measures regarding the healthy lifestyles of individuals Others think it must be managed by individuals Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing Why is this happening What measures could be taken to ensure they do not disappear 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
A countrys history is embodied in a large number of legally protected historic buildings. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the past that supports modern people gaining a deeper understanding and utili...
^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...periodic control of Colosseum has shaped the structure getting better maintained ...
^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itive impacts including saving long-term historical value and generating area rev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88172043011 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29860507907 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8462321226 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264886971521 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754201787983 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460960717547 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14533041874 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447607935103 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.