More and more people want to own items, such as cars, clothing and other things, that are made by famous brands. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Many consumers are increasingly possessed in expensive goods produced by well-known brands. I will contend with how this viewpoint initiates to greater advantages which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, the benefits of owning fancy goods is boosting government revenue through progressive tax. Based on USA tax policies, wealthier folks impose higher taxes about 10% on each high-end amenity and ones can also endow opportunities for charitable donations. Furthermore, people may also receive a sense of satisfaction for their persevering efforts. Not only earning as a source of investment, but to fit in with certain social group can also be perceived as a signal achievement that they are worthy of respect and inspiration. The Journal of Consumer Psychology presents that high-cost stuff shapes people to be more confident and powerful.
On the other hand, we should emphasize some drawbacks of this issue that luxury-loving individuals may inflict social inequality involving higher crime rate as happened in Kim Kardashian. After showing-off her jewellery on social media, she became a criminal target, robbery, in Paris. This means that the existence of social jealousy can reduce solidarity and social bonds among people. Moreover, through flaunting-wealth and materialism, individual known as oniomania is likely suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder. Undoubtedly, strong pressure to conform in social standard affects the personages always feeling less and worrying about prosperity - as in Western society - which they feel uncontrollable need to shop.
In summary, despite some considerable demerits, I would refute that the merits of buying branded items are more remarkable consensus, including assisting national development with a great tax-conscious community and uplifting people’s self-esteem reflecting human emotion.
- The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people However some argue that younger people make better bosses To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In more and more countries people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts Why might this be the case Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation s history However some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices How important is it to maintain old building 84
- Despite better access to education many adults today still can not read or write In what ways are they disadvantaged What can governments do to help them 89
- Some people think the government should take measures regarding the healthy lifestyle of individuals Others think it must be managed by individuals Discuss both sides and give you opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87226277372 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23275115099 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.715328467153 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7190835955 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0825874274247 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249446195798 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420690913665 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0512458715668 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537786748675 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.