Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Many people argue that high school students nowadays have the right to give comments or criticism to their teachers with the purpose of improving educational teaching standards. Others, however, hold that it will cost disrespect and indiscipline in the classroom. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and show why I am in favor of the former.
On the one hand, it is understandable that students should not be allowed to give adjustments to their tutors as it will lead to rudeness and agitation. Their rationale is that children are immature, impulsive, and inexperienced which could create a negative atmosphere in the classroom as well as hurt teachers feeling. When it comes to controversial issues, students are not able to deliberate and control their actions which can easily cause chaos. For example, when their mathematics teachers have an incomprehensive teaching method, it will be difficult for them to make a judgment on the teacher’s lessons as they do not know how to express their thought. However, there are many ways for students to assess a teacher’s lessons without making comments or criticisms. Take a survey for example, in order to improve the quality of education, high schools create a survey to understand student opinions about teachers’ teaching methods without commenting directly on them. It will be much more polite and kind as it does not hurt the teacher's feelings.
On the other hand, I am convinced that students are encouraged to make their assessments on their teachers to develop the standard of education. One reason is that this way helps learners boost their critical thinking and ensure the level of comprehension in every lesson. Take physics, for example, there are numerous topics related to the outside world which are difficult to understand; so, it is necessary for students to make a comment on the teacher’s guidance method. As a result, it helps improve their knowledge about the subject. Another reason is teachers can adjust their speed when they deliver any information on the lesson. If they deliver the lesson too fast, students are not able to understand clearly about it; so, it is important to modify the speed when they present it to students.
In conclusion, there are good reasons to believe that high school students should not be permitted to make any adjustments to their teachers. However, I am convinced that giving assessments can help improve education standards.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-13 | MinhJoyluv | 87 | view |
2023-04-23 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 73 | view |
2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 67 | view |
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 63
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12718204489 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84792833986 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488778054863 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0733626956 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356238897184 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111200797394 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715547417906 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229780699172 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788486111836 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.