The production of goods and materials are still questionable for myriad countries. Although, there is a group of people , who argue that countries should manufacture products as much as they can, I deem that countries should produce things as per demands. Both, positives and negatives of over production will be discussed in following paragraphs.
In the positive sides, the proliferating production would succor countries to become hub of any materials and goods. This is only possible if a country strive to manufacture things as much as they can. However, countries should target their domestic consumers first, then they export produced material and goods to other countries. This is how they can become hub of any products. Take an example of China as it knows as hub of steel. Furthermore, by striving the more production, counties can also proffer employment to their residents. Hence, it will be win-win situction for both, for nations as well as
for people.
On the flip side of over production, it would be futile if demands of particular material are limited so, before commencing the production of anything, countries should also analyze the demand of particular product. Other than this, underdevolped and developing countries can not focus only on manufacturing as they also have other area to look after. For instance, a few countries from Africa continent could not focus only on production as their governments could not proffer basic need of people.
In conclusion, though, there are many benefits of increasing production, I tend to deem that countries should produce things as per demands and according to their ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...still questionable for myriad countries.Although, there is a group of people , who argue...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ies.Although, there is a group of people , who argue that countries should manufac...
^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Both
...es should produce things as per demands.Both, positives and negatives of over produc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...o become hub of any materials and goods.This is only possible if a country strive to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...win-win situction for both, for nations as well as for people. On the flip side of ove...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re commencing the production of anything ,countries should also analyze the demand...
^^
Line 6, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Other
...nalyze the demand of particular product.Other than this, underdevolped and developing...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and developing countries can not focus only on manufacturing as they also have ...
^^
Line 6, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...they also have other area to look after.For instance, a few countries from Africa c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, still, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35907335907 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11259134036 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552123552124 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 141.760186997 49.4020404114 287% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.222222222 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207294664392 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842504534542 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604274028851 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142622646386 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309900837274 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.