Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside. Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Hitherto, globalization has led to the big disparity in city and countryside lifestyle, and the question of whether the lifestyle in city is better than that in the suburbs area or not has been raising public attention. While many people lament that city must be the best place to develop a healthy lifestyle, I gravitate toward the countryside by giving some rational evidence.
It is conspicuous that the city has more modern facilities which can ensure our health easily; furthermore, they have more job opportunities for residents so that they will not have to concern about economic issues. However, in the city area, they can face tons of deadlines which are given by their companies, although there are many public places for residents to do exercise, their work will occupy them. What’s more, there is a new depicting that the backbone diseases rate in the city is outweighed those in suburb zone, this is the aftermath of office working. Almost all jobs in cities required sitting in one place for a long time, so the staffs’ backbone will be damage and change the shape.
On the other hand, I express my strong support for a better lifestyle in suburbs. Although people think that the countryside has few artificial factors so their life will be inconvenient, the fact proved the opposite. People have more open space in the suburbs so that they can enjoy doing outside activities like farming or folklore games which can extremely good for their physical health. Due to the shortage of technology, they are able to stay away from high-tech devices, this is not only good for their eyes but also allows them to have time for their families. Furthermore, the number of vehicles in the countryside is not as much as in a city, so the atmosphere here is more cleaner, creating a sense of relaxation for people and deterring them from respiratory diseases. Scientists in Vietnam made a survey a few years ago about the life-span of two groups of people who live in disparity countryside and city zone, the result that seldom do farmers died before the age of 60, while the number was under 50 in the other group, this strongly consolidate the healthy lifestyle of suburb people.
In conclusion, living in the city have its own perks but it is better to have a lifestyle in the countryside.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-27 | nav200408@gmail.com | 80 | view |
2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
2022-03-26 | vidung | 89 | view |
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Some people believe that the best way to encourage children that have a healthy diet at school and some people believe that parents should teach them to have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 66
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... in city and countryside lifestyle, and the question of whether the lifestyle in city is better than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'suburbs'' or 'suburb's'?
Suggestion: suburbs'; suburb's
...tyle in city is better than that in the suburbs area or not has been raising public att...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
...as in a city, so the atmosphere here is more cleaner, creating a sense of relaxation for peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82070707071 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65396591886 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7186606479 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.846153846 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4615384615 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202711728469 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796153075294 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517612781352 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147638232285 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429876623271 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.