Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside. Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities. Discuss both views and give your opinions
The 21st century has witness the explosion of a variety of health-related issues, among those, there is a heated debate about whether it is more conducive to lead a healthy lifestyle in the suburbs compared to the urban area. This essay will explain further both viewpoints and why I would take side with the former.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that living in the rural area brings people lots of health-related benefits. First and foremost, it is the clean and fresh environment without the appearance of toxic pollutants that make the countryside be in favour of the majority when it comes to improving their well-being. That is to say, people’s physical condition can be improved in the long run as they may not fall victim to environmental pollution. The second things to take into consideration is the availability of spacious green area within close proximity to rural inhabitants, which can encourage residents to spare more time for outdoor activities. This is not only beneficial to their physical health but also a great assistance for their mental status. It is proved in recent research that people pursuing a slow and peaceful living pace in the countryside can increase their average life expectancy to 100 years old.
On the other hand, we should not be ignorant of the fact that living in a metropolis does bring certain merits to city dwellers. The validity of the latest technology in the health care systems provide plenty of advantages to people living there. For instance, those living in big city can easily get access to a wide range of medical services and top-tier professionals that is almost inaccessible in the suburban area.
All in all, even though some existing positive aspects of living in metropolitan area, I still adhere to the opinion that life in the suburbs is more advantageous for inhabitants’ well-beings in the long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-27 | nav200408@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | vidung | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers Some disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers Some disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...ilability of spacious green area within close proximity to rural inhabitants, which can encoura...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, well, for instance, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00636942675 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87677646566 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0674648598 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15446897358 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547308121562 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328873995071 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854061544384 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314289210337 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.