Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence in films on television and at the cinema. Others feel that violent films should not be regulated. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a heated debate in this day and age considering whether brutality in movies should be placed under strict regulation of authorities or it is filmmakers and viewers’ freedom to be fully access to these scenes. From my personal standpoint, notwithstanding the fact that both advocates has their own reasons, I would take side with the former.
On the one hand, it is content that the incorporation of violence in movies is the driving force behind the growth of crime rates and misconducts in modern society. To be more specific, the young, as the main viewers, whose cognitions and manners are not fully-developed, may consider these behaviours as the norm and start imitating actions conducted in the movies. That is to say, without government’s proper regulations, more and more inappropriate behaviours may be carried out on a large scale which would sabotage society’s moral standards in the long run.
On the one hand, some people hold the belief that bloodshed scenes play an indispensable role as the main attracting feature in horror and action films. First and foremost, these thrill scenes not only draw public’s attention to the movies but also make a great contribution to the increase of profits for the film producer. Secondly, it is undeniable that a majority of people favouring these types of movie both as an effective stress relief and a superb method to escape from their boring lifestyle. A viewer once told a magazine that she addicted to the excitement and fluttering effects that is aroused by watching bloodshed scenes while others reported to experienced an upbeat mood after watching these scenarios.
In the nutshell, I would content with the idea that hostile scenes should not be put under the control of any governments, it is the mass public’s choice whether they want to watch these contents or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | Hannahnguyen | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | ngannguyen2408 | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 84
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 67
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07843137255 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90679248006 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604575163399 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.6976533302 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 155.4 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121012900556 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419633299116 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280479246226 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676462608314 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242571336602 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.