Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence in films on television and at the cinema. Others feel that violent films should not be regulated. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this age of change, it is sometimes argued that it is advisable for authorities to modify the suitable category of films associated with violence on TV as well as cinemas. Sone have serious disapprovals of this issue. In my opinion, I am skewed of the first one.
On the one hand, people owning civil' rights could watch as numerous levels of films as they want. Existingly, human are not reliant excessively on the government's expenses about spheres of life such as eating, drinking or even finance. They would feel that it is attributably the private disturbance in regulating programmes. The intervention of locals and authorities could trigger a dramatic fall on the proportion of aggressive films, prompting this genre of program might be crossed out.
On the other hand, there are two underlying reasons of imposing a cap on violent matters through films. Firstly, it seems to be considered as a effective and safe method for students not to apply aggressive activities in schools. This could be explained by the fact that exposuring to over cruelty on TV or cinemas such as bloodshed without any stringent observations from parents may provoke them to be accustomed to those behaviors. It means that this type could become their habitually favorite entertainment amenity in their leisure time. As a result, the educational violence could be the by-product of intensely aggressive films.
Secondly, applying a moderate of violence in media outlets or cinemas still might bring the sensational characteristic for that film. To avoid boredom, the violent details could be assessed as a pretext to core emotions of viewers. Incorporating violence could assist inhabitants to experience a host of feelings such as happy, sad or even thrill and fear. All of films from Asia to Europe are related to the violent background appropriately, even the slightest form of physical conflicts can be considered violent. The appearance of violent elements plays a vital role in establishing a potline as well as catching audiences' eyes.
To sum up, lessening the level of violent programmes seems to be an encouraged way for government in education but it still brings the comfortable and detective feelings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | Hannahnguyen | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | ngannguyen2408 | 84 | view |
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 89
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve the crime Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence in films on television and at the cinema Others feel that violent films should not be regulated Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...violence on TV as well as cinemas. Sone have serious disapprovals of this issue. In ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... Firstly, it seems to be considered as a effective and safe method for students ...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e comfortable and detective feelings.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16480446927 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01314313522 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5711868997 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.722222222 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214705124782 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590571563674 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392618998483 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107760735441 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383786939812 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.